Employment in agriculture — all countries

Employment in agriculture — Low-income countries

Employment in agriculture in low-income countries in 2025 — 58.5%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 7.7 pp.

2025 58.5% −0.4 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 67.1%1995
Period minimum 57.4%2019

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Employment in agriculture — Low-income countries, 1991–20255557.56062.56567.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 66.2%1992: 66.9%1993: 67%1994: 66.9%1995: 67.1%1996: 66.8%1997: 66.9%1998: 66.9%1999: 66.6%2000: 66.6%2001: 66.4%2002: 66.2%2003: 66%2004: 65.6%2005: 65.4%2006: 64.8%2007: 64.2%2008: 63.6%2009: 63.2%2010: 62.2%2011: 61.7%2012: 61.3%2013: 61.4%2014: 60.9%2015: 60.5%2016: 59.9%2017: 59.3%2018: 58.4%2019: 57.4%2020: 59.4%2021: 60%2022: 59.5%2023: 59.8%2024: 58.9%2025: 58.5%
Change over the period: −7.7 pp Annual average: -0.23 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Low-income countries

Low-income countries 58.5%
World 25.8%
Employment in agriculture — Low-income countries, by year Low-income countries All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 58.5 −0.4 pp
2024 58.9 −0.9 pp
2023 59.8 +0.3 pp
2022 59.5 −0.4 pp
2021 60 +0.6 pp
2020 59.4 +2 pp
2019 57.4 −1.1 pp
2018 58.4 −0.8 pp
2017 59.3 −0.7 pp
2016 59.9 −0.5 pp
2015 60.5 −0.5 pp
2014 60.9 −0.5 pp
2013 61.4 +0.1 pp
2012 61.3 −0.4 pp
2011 61.7 −0.5 pp
2010 62.2 −1 pp
2009 63.2 −0.4 pp
2008 63.6 −0.7 pp
2007 64.2 −0.6 pp
2006 64.8 −0.6 pp
2005 65.4 −0.3 pp
2004 65.6 −0.4 pp
2003 66 −0.2 pp
2002 66.2 −0.2 pp
2001 66.4 −0.2 pp
2000 66.6 −0 pp
1999 66.6 −0.3 pp
1998 66.9 +0 pp
1997 66.9 +0.1 pp
1996 66.8 −0.3 pp
1995 67.1 +0.1 pp
1994 66.9 −0.1 pp
1993 67 +0.1 pp
1992 66.9 +0.7 pp
1991 66.2 —

About the indicator

The share of total employment in agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing. Set against the share of agriculture in GDP it shows the productivity of the sector: if farming employs 50% of workers and produces 20% of GDP, labor productivity there is three times below the average for the economy.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.