Employment in agriculture — all countries

Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste

Employment in agriculture in Timor-Leste in 2025 — 46%. Ranked 26 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 13.7 pp.

2025 46% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 26of 182
Period maximum 59.7%1991
Period minimum 37.8%2021

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste, 1991–20253040506019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 59.7%1992: 59%1993: 58.4%1994: 57.8%1995: 57.3%1996: 56.8%1997: 56.6%1998: 57%1999: 56.4%2000: 54.5%2001: 53.3%2002: 54.2%2003: 54.5%2004: 54.7%2005: 54.2%2006: 54.7%2007: 53.7%2008: 52.6%2009: 51.1%2010: 50.8%2011: 49.5%2012: 48.8%2013: 48%2014: 46.7%2015: 45.4%2016: 44.1%2017: 43.8%2018: 43.1%2019: 39.8%2020: 39.4%2021: 37.8%2022: 48.3%2023: 48.4%2024: 46.3%2025: 46%
Change over the period: −13.7 pp Annual average: -0.4 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste 46%
World 25.8%
South-Eastern Asia computed 26.6%
Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste, by year Timor-Leste All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 46 −0.3 pp
2024 46.3 −2 pp
2023 48.4 +0.1 pp
2022 48.3 +10.4 pp
2021 37.8 −1.5 pp
2020 39.4 −0.4 pp
2019 39.8 −3.3 pp
2018 43.1 −0.7 pp
2017 43.8 −0.4 pp
2016 44.1 −1.3 pp
2015 45.4 −1.3 pp
2014 46.7 −1.3 pp
2013 48 −0.8 pp
2012 48.8 −0.7 pp
2011 49.5 −1.2 pp
2010 50.8 −0.3 pp
2009 51.1 −1.5 pp
2008 52.6 −1 pp
2007 53.7 −1.1 pp
2006 54.7 +0.5 pp
2005 54.2 −0.5 pp
2004 54.7 +0.1 pp
2003 54.5 +0.3 pp
2002 54.2 +0.9 pp
2001 53.3 −1.2 pp
2000 54.5 −1.9 pp
1999 56.4 −0.5 pp
1998 57 +0.3 pp
1997 56.6 −0.1 pp
1996 56.8 −0.6 pp
1995 57.3 −0.5 pp
1994 57.8 −0.6 pp
1993 58.4 −0.6 pp
1992 59 −0.7 pp
1991 59.7 —

About the indicator

The share of total employment in agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing. Set against the share of agriculture in GDP it shows the productivity of the sector: if farming employs 50% of workers and produces 20% of GDP, labor productivity there is three times below the average for the economy.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.