Income share of the richest 20% — all countries

Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica

Income share of the richest 20% in Costa Rica in 2025 — 50.9%. Ranked 3 in the world out of 4. Since 1981, the indicator has fallen by 0.5 pp.

2025 50.9% −0.2 pp vs 2024
World rank 3of 4
Period maximum 56.7%2002
Period minimum 39.6%1986

Trend over time

1981–2025 · % of income

Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica, 1981–202535404550556019811986199119962001200620112016202120251981: 51.4%1986: 39.6%1989: 49.9%1990: 49.6%1991: 50.8%1992: 50.3%1993: 50.5%1994: 51.5%1995: 50.3%1996: 51.1%1997: 50.6%1998: 50.8%1999: 52.6%2000: 52.1%2001: 56.2%2002: 56.7%2003: 54%2004: 53.4%2005: 52.8%2006: 54.7%2007: 55%2008: 54.1%2009: 55.9%2010: 53.6%2011: 53.9%2012: 53.6%2013: 54.2%2014: 53.9%2015: 53.9%2016: 54%2017: 54%2018: 53.3%2019: 53.7%2020: 54.4%2021: 54.1%2022: 52.7%2023: 52.1%2024: 51.1%2025: 50.9%
Change over the period: −0.5 pp Annual average: -0.01 pp
Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica, by year Costa Rica All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 50.9 −0.2 pp
2024 51.1 −1 pp
2023 52.1 −0.6 pp
2022 52.7 −1.4 pp
2021 54.1 −0.3 pp
2020 54.4 +0.7 pp
2019 53.7 +0.4 pp
2018 53.3 −0.7 pp
2017 54 +0 pp
2016 54 +0.1 pp
2015 53.9 +0 pp
2014 53.9 −0.3 pp
2013 54.2 +0.6 pp
2012 53.6 −0.3 pp
2011 53.9 +0.3 pp
2010 53.6 −2.3 pp
2009 55.9 +1.8 pp
2008 54.1 −0.9 pp
2007 55 +0.3 pp
2006 54.7 +1.9 pp
2005 52.8 −0.6 pp
2004 53.4 −0.6 pp
2003 54 −2.7 pp
2002 56.7 +0.5 pp
2001 56.2 +4.1 pp
2000 52.1 −0.5 pp
1999 52.6 +1.8 pp
1998 50.8 +0.2 pp
1997 50.6 −0.5 pp
1996 51.1 +0.8 pp
1995 50.3 −1.2 pp
1994 51.5 +1 pp
1993 50.5 +0.2 pp
1992 50.3 −0.5 pp
1991 50.8 +1.2 pp
1990 49.6 −0.3 pp
1989 49.9 —
1986 39.6 —
1981 51.4 —

About the indicator

The share of total income or consumption that goes to the richest twenty percent of the population. Under complete equality it would be twenty percent; in the most unequal countries of Latin America and Southern Africa it comes to more than sixty. The ratio of this share to the share of the poorest quintile — the quintile ratio, S80/S20 — was historically the first measure of inequality, and it speaks more clearly than the Gini index about the gap between the poles.

Important: There are no aggregates for country groups for the same reason as with the Gini index: the quintile of a group is not a union of national quintiles. Household surveys systematically understate the incomes of the richest, so real inequality is higher than measured.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.