Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Bhutan

Youth unemployment in Bhutan in 2025 — 17.05%. Ranked 120 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 12.82 pp.

2025 17.05% −0.88 pp vs 2024
World rank 120of 182
Period maximum 27.18%2022
Period minimum 4.19%1999

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Bhutan, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.24%1992: 4.25%1993: 4.3%1994: 4.26%1995: 4.24%1996: 4.21%1997: 4.21%1998: 4.22%1999: 4.19%2000: 4.9%2001: 5.59%2002: 5.49%2003: 5.38%2004: 7.49%2005: 9.44%2006: 9.54%2007: 11.41%2008: 11.94%2009: 12.42%2010: 8.78%2011: 8.91%2012: 6.98%2013: 9.39%2014: 9.02%2015: 10.12%2016: 11.61%2017: 13.36%2018: 15.2%2019: 11.56%2020: 21.99%2021: 20.61%2022: 27.18%2023: 14.94%2024: 17.93%2025: 17.05%
Change over the period: +12.82 pp Annual average: 0.38 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bhutan

Bhutan 17.05%
World 13.41%
South Asia 15.4%
Southern Asia computed 15.06%
Youth unemployment — Bhutan, by year Bhutan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 17.05 −0.88 pp
2024 17.93 +3 pp
2023 14.94 −12.24 pp
2022 27.18 +6.57 pp
2021 20.61 −1.38 pp
2020 21.99 +10.43 pp
2019 11.56 −3.64 pp
2018 15.2 +1.84 pp
2017 13.36 +1.74 pp
2016 11.61 +1.5 pp
2015 10.12 +1.09 pp
2014 9.02 −0.37 pp
2013 9.39 +2.41 pp
2012 6.98 −1.93 pp
2011 8.91 +0.13 pp
2010 8.78 −3.64 pp
2009 12.42 +0.48 pp
2008 11.94 +0.53 pp
2007 11.41 +1.87 pp
2006 9.54 +0.1 pp
2005 9.44 +1.95 pp
2004 7.49 +2.11 pp
2003 5.38 −0.11 pp
2002 5.49 −0.1 pp
2001 5.59 +0.69 pp
2000 4.9 +0.71 pp
1999 4.19 −0.03 pp
1998 4.22 +0.01 pp
1997 4.21 −0 pp
1996 4.21 −0.03 pp
1995 4.24 −0.02 pp
1994 4.26 −0.04 pp
1993 4.3 +0.05 pp
1992 4.25 +0.01 pp
1991 4.24 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.