Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Cameroon

Youth unemployment in Cameroon in 2025 — 6.55%. Ranked 38 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 6.65 pp.

2025 6.55% −0.07 pp vs 2024
World rank 38of 182
Period maximum 13.33%1993
Period minimum 4.58%2007

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Cameroon, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.2%1992: 13.25%1993: 13.33%1994: 13.03%1995: 12.73%1996: 12.14%1997: 11.87%1998: 11.65%1999: 11.49%2000: 11.38%2001: 11.26%2002: 10.12%2003: 8.92%2004: 7.7%2005: 6.63%2006: 5.6%2007: 4.58%2008: 5.12%2009: 5.71%2010: 6.32%2011: 6.31%2012: 6.27%2013: 6.24%2014: 6.2%2015: 6.23%2016: 6.3%2017: 6.41%2018: 6.5%2019: 6.59%2020: 7.37%2021: 7.23%2022: 6.67%2023: 6.62%2024: 6.62%2025: 6.55%
Change over the period: −6.65 pp Annual average: -0.2 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Cameroon

Cameroon 6.55%
World 13.41%
Middle Africa computed 12.58%
Youth unemployment — Cameroon, by year Cameroon All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.55 −0.07 pp
2024 6.62 −0 pp
2023 6.62 −0.05 pp
2022 6.67 −0.56 pp
2021 7.23 −0.15 pp
2020 7.37 +0.79 pp
2019 6.59 +0.08 pp
2018 6.5 +0.1 pp
2017 6.41 +0.11 pp
2016 6.3 +0.07 pp
2015 6.23 +0.03 pp
2014 6.2 −0.04 pp
2013 6.24 −0.04 pp
2012 6.27 −0.04 pp
2011 6.31 −0.01 pp
2010 6.32 +0.61 pp
2009 5.71 +0.59 pp
2008 5.12 +0.54 pp
2007 4.58 −1.02 pp
2006 5.6 −1.03 pp
2005 6.63 −1.07 pp
2004 7.7 −1.22 pp
2003 8.92 −1.2 pp
2002 10.12 −1.14 pp
2001 11.26 −0.12 pp
2000 11.38 −0.11 pp
1999 11.49 −0.16 pp
1998 11.65 −0.23 pp
1997 11.87 −0.27 pp
1996 12.14 −0.59 pp
1995 12.73 −0.3 pp
1994 13.03 −0.3 pp
1993 13.33 +0.08 pp
1992 13.25 +0.05 pp
1991 13.2 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.