Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia

Youth unemployment in Europe & Central Asia in 2025 — 13.99%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.89 pp.

2025 13.99% −0.13 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 21.53%1998
Period minimum 13.99%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia, 1991–202512141618202219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 14.88%1992: 15.91%1993: 18.22%1994: 19.59%1995: 20.29%1996: 20.96%1997: 21.23%1998: 21.53%1999: 21.22%2000: 19.63%2001: 18.87%2002: 18.88%2003: 19.1%2004: 19.03%2005: 18.59%2006: 17.67%2007: 15.97%2008: 15.94%2009: 19.84%2010: 19.98%2011: 19.72%2012: 20.55%2013: 20.93%2014: 20.53%2015: 19.94%2016: 19.11%2017: 17.9%2018: 16.83%2019: 16.47%2020: 18.17%2021: 17.53%2022: 15.25%2023: 14.51%2024: 14.12%2025: 13.99%
Change over the period: −0.89 pp Annual average: -0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Europe & Central Asia

Europe & Central Asia 13.99%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Europe & Central Asia, by year Europe & Central Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 13.99 −0.13 pp
2024 14.12 −0.4 pp
2023 14.51 −0.73 pp
2022 15.25 −2.28 pp
2021 17.53 −0.64 pp
2020 18.17 +1.7 pp
2019 16.47 −0.36 pp
2018 16.83 −1.07 pp
2017 17.9 −1.21 pp
2016 19.11 −0.83 pp
2015 19.94 −0.59 pp
2014 20.53 −0.4 pp
2013 20.93 +0.37 pp
2012 20.55 +0.83 pp
2011 19.72 −0.26 pp
2010 19.98 +0.14 pp
2009 19.84 +3.9 pp
2008 15.94 −0.03 pp
2007 15.97 −1.7 pp
2006 17.67 −0.92 pp
2005 18.59 −0.44 pp
2004 19.03 −0.07 pp
2003 19.1 +0.22 pp
2002 18.88 +0.01 pp
2001 18.87 −0.76 pp
2000 19.63 −1.59 pp
1999 21.22 −0.32 pp
1998 21.53 +0.31 pp
1997 21.23 +0.27 pp
1996 20.96 +0.67 pp
1995 20.29 +0.7 pp
1994 19.59 +1.37 pp
1993 18.22 +2.32 pp
1992 15.91 +1.03 pp
1991 14.88 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.