Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Nigeria

Youth unemployment in Nigeria in 2025 — 5.34%. Ranked 28 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 2.09 pp.

2025 5.34% +0.25 pp vs 2024
World rank 28of 182
Period maximum 10.84%2020
Period minimum 5.09%2024

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Nigeria, 1991–2025468101219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 7.43%1992: 7.24%1993: 7.56%1994: 7.58%1995: 7.7%1996: 7.54%1997: 7.45%1998: 7.41%1999: 7.55%2000: 7.57%2001: 7.54%2002: 7.22%2003: 7.23%2004: 7.23%2005: 7.54%2006: 7.69%2007: 7.86%2008: 7.92%2009: 7.84%2010: 7.86%2011: 7.9%2012: 7.86%2013: 7.71%2014: 8.04%2015: 8.46%2016: 9.1%2017: 9.71%2018: 10.14%2019: 10.42%2020: 10.84%2021: 8.99%2022: 6.02%2023: 5.13%2024: 5.09%2025: 5.34%
Change over the period: −2.09 pp Annual average: -0.06 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Nigeria

Nigeria 5.34%
World 13.41%
Western Africa computed 4.95%
Youth unemployment — Nigeria, by year Nigeria All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 5.34 +0.25 pp
2024 5.09 −0.04 pp
2023 5.13 −0.89 pp
2022 6.02 −2.97 pp
2021 8.99 −1.85 pp
2020 10.84 +0.42 pp
2019 10.42 +0.28 pp
2018 10.14 +0.43 pp
2017 9.71 +0.61 pp
2016 9.1 +0.64 pp
2015 8.46 +0.41 pp
2014 8.04 +0.33 pp
2013 7.71 −0.15 pp
2012 7.86 −0.04 pp
2011 7.9 +0.04 pp
2010 7.86 +0.02 pp
2009 7.84 −0.09 pp
2008 7.92 +0.06 pp
2007 7.86 +0.17 pp
2006 7.69 +0.15 pp
2005 7.54 +0.31 pp
2004 7.23 −0 pp
2003 7.23 +0.01 pp
2002 7.22 −0.32 pp
2001 7.54 −0.03 pp
2000 7.57 +0.02 pp
1999 7.55 +0.14 pp
1998 7.41 −0.04 pp
1997 7.45 −0.09 pp
1996 7.54 −0.16 pp
1995 7.7 +0.12 pp
1994 7.58 +0.02 pp
1993 7.56 +0.31 pp
1992 7.24 −0.18 pp
1991 7.43 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.