Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Central Asia

Youth unemployment in Central Asia in 2025 — 8.93%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 6.35 pp.

2025 8.93% +0.35 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 21.72%1999
Period minimum 2.58%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Central Asia, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 2.58%1992: 3.41%1993: 5.17%1994: 11.88%1995: 15.01%1996: 18.86%1997: 19.2%1998: 21.37%1999: 21.72%2000: 20.3%2001: 18.05%2002: 16.49%2003: 14.72%2004: 13.74%2005: 12.27%2006: 10.87%2007: 9.17%2008: 8.73%2009: 8.98%2010: 8.89%2011: 8.31%2012: 8.24%2013: 8.31%2014: 8.63%2015: 8.69%2016: 8.76%2017: 9.42%2018: 9.08%2019: 9.02%2020: 9.86%2021: 10.06%2022: 8.79%2023: 8.54%2024: 8.58%2025: 8.93%
Change over the period: +6.35 pp Annual average: 0.19 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Central Asia

Central Asia 8.93%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Central Asia, by year Central Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 8.93 +0.35 pp
2024 8.58 +0.04 pp
2023 8.54 −0.25 pp
2022 8.79 −1.26 pp
2021 10.06 +0.2 pp
2020 9.86 +0.84 pp
2019 9.02 −0.06 pp
2018 9.08 −0.34 pp
2017 9.42 +0.66 pp
2016 8.76 +0.07 pp
2015 8.69 +0.06 pp
2014 8.63 +0.32 pp
2013 8.31 +0.07 pp
2012 8.24 −0.08 pp
2011 8.31 −0.58 pp
2010 8.89 −0.09 pp
2009 8.98 +0.24 pp
2008 8.73 −0.44 pp
2007 9.17 −1.7 pp
2006 10.87 −1.4 pp
2005 12.27 −1.47 pp
2004 13.74 −0.99 pp
2003 14.72 −1.76 pp
2002 16.49 −1.56 pp
2001 18.05 −2.25 pp
2000 20.3 −1.42 pp
1999 21.72 +0.35 pp
1998 21.37 +2.17 pp
1997 19.2 +0.34 pp
1996 18.86 +3.85 pp
1995 15.01 +3.13 pp
1994 11.88 +6.72 pp
1993 5.17 +1.76 pp
1992 3.41 +0.83 pp
1991 2.58 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.