Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia

Youth unemployment in Eastern Asia in 2025 — 14.37%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 9.89 pp.

2025 14.37% +0.65 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 14.37%2025
Period minimum 4.47%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 4.47%1992: 4.53%1993: 5.23%1994: 5.66%1995: 5.96%1996: 6.3%1997: 6.6%1998: 7.04%1999: 7.23%2000: 7.17%2001: 8.18%2002: 8.99%2003: 9.66%2004: 9.44%2005: 9.41%2006: 9.22%2007: 9.06%2008: 9.54%2009: 10.02%2010: 9.73%2011: 9.76%2012: 9.89%2013: 9.96%2014: 10.08%2015: 10.22%2016: 10.12%2017: 9.93%2018: 9.2%2019: 10.08%2020: 11.88%2021: 11.6%2022: 13.46%2023: 14.15%2024: 13.71%2025: 14.37%
Change over the period: +9.89 pp Annual average: 0.29 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eastern Asia

Eastern Asia 14.37%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Eastern Asia, by year Eastern Asia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 14.37 +0.65 pp
2024 13.71 −0.44 pp
2023 14.15 +0.69 pp
2022 13.46 +1.85 pp
2021 11.6 −0.28 pp
2020 11.88 +1.8 pp
2019 10.08 +0.88 pp
2018 9.2 −0.73 pp
2017 9.93 −0.19 pp
2016 10.12 −0.1 pp
2015 10.22 +0.14 pp
2014 10.08 +0.12 pp
2013 9.96 +0.08 pp
2012 9.89 +0.13 pp
2011 9.76 +0.03 pp
2010 9.73 −0.28 pp
2009 10.02 +0.48 pp
2008 9.54 +0.48 pp
2007 9.06 −0.16 pp
2006 9.22 −0.19 pp
2005 9.41 −0.03 pp
2004 9.44 −0.22 pp
2003 9.66 +0.67 pp
2002 8.99 +0.81 pp
2001 8.18 +1.01 pp
2000 7.17 −0.06 pp
1999 7.23 +0.19 pp
1998 7.04 +0.44 pp
1997 6.6 +0.3 pp
1996 6.3 +0.35 pp
1995 5.96 +0.3 pp
1994 5.66 +0.43 pp
1993 5.23 +0.7 pp
1992 4.53 +0.06 pp
1991 4.47 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.