Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe

Youth unemployment in Eastern Europe in 2025 — 9.89%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 3.92 pp.

2025 9.89% −0.47 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 23.6%1998
Period minimum 9.89%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe, 1991–202551015202519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.81%1992: 14.24%1993: 15.45%1994: 17.08%1995: 19.21%1996: 20.23%1997: 21.4%1998: 23.6%1999: 23.47%2000: 22.37%2001: 21.83%2002: 20.77%2003: 20.97%2004: 20.59%2005: 19.05%2006: 18.23%2007: 15.47%2008: 14.54%2009: 18.77%2010: 18.73%2011: 18.27%2012: 18.21%2013: 17.89%2014: 17.75%2015: 18.04%2016: 17.42%2017: 15.77%2018: 15.34%2019: 13.78%2020: 15.79%2021: 15.68%2022: 13.64%2023: 11.93%2024: 10.37%2025: 9.89%
Change over the period: −3.92 pp Annual average: -0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eastern Europe

Eastern Europe 9.89%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Eastern Europe, by year Eastern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.89 −0.47 pp
2024 10.37 −1.56 pp
2023 11.93 −1.71 pp
2022 13.64 −2.04 pp
2021 15.68 −0.11 pp
2020 15.79 +2.01 pp
2019 13.78 −1.57 pp
2018 15.34 −0.43 pp
2017 15.77 −1.65 pp
2016 17.42 −0.62 pp
2015 18.04 +0.29 pp
2014 17.75 −0.14 pp
2013 17.89 −0.32 pp
2012 18.21 −0.06 pp
2011 18.27 −0.47 pp
2010 18.73 −0.04 pp
2009 18.77 +4.23 pp
2008 14.54 −0.93 pp
2007 15.47 −2.76 pp
2006 18.23 −0.82 pp
2005 19.05 −1.54 pp
2004 20.59 −0.38 pp
2003 20.97 +0.2 pp
2002 20.77 −1.06 pp
2001 21.83 −0.53 pp
2000 22.37 −1.1 pp
1999 23.47 −0.13 pp
1998 23.6 +2.19 pp
1997 21.4 +1.18 pp
1996 20.23 +1.01 pp
1995 19.21 +2.14 pp
1994 17.08 +1.63 pp
1993 15.45 +1.21 pp
1992 14.24 +0.42 pp
1991 13.81 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.