Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Northern Europe

Youth unemployment in Northern Europe in 2025 — 15.5%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 3.1 pp.

2025 15.5% +0.41 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 21.58%2012
Period minimum 12%2022

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Northern Europe, 1991–20251012.51517.52022.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.41%1992: 14.95%1993: 18.94%1994: 17.96%1995: 18.11%1996: 17.78%1997: 16.02%1998: 14.46%1999: 14.13%2000: 12.92%2001: 12.33%2002: 12.51%2003: 13.24%2004: 12.91%2005: 14.3%2006: 14.4%2007: 13.73%2008: 14.86%2009: 20.14%2010: 21.23%2011: 21.52%2012: 21.58%2013: 20.42%2014: 17.77%2015: 15.84%2016: 14.2%2017: 13.47%2018: 12.4%2019: 12.03%2020: 14.94%2021: 14.41%2022: 12%2023: 13.11%2024: 15.09%2025: 15.5%
Change over the period: +3.1 pp Annual average: 0.09 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Northern Europe

Northern Europe 15.5%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Northern Europe, by year Northern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.5 +0.41 pp
2024 15.09 +1.98 pp
2023 13.11 +1.11 pp
2022 12 −2.41 pp
2021 14.41 −0.53 pp
2020 14.94 +2.92 pp
2019 12.03 −0.37 pp
2018 12.4 −1.08 pp
2017 13.47 −0.73 pp
2016 14.2 −1.64 pp
2015 15.84 −1.93 pp
2014 17.77 −2.65 pp
2013 20.42 −1.17 pp
2012 21.58 +0.06 pp
2011 21.52 +0.29 pp
2010 21.23 +1.09 pp
2009 20.14 +5.29 pp
2008 14.86 +1.12 pp
2007 13.73 −0.66 pp
2006 14.4 +0.1 pp
2005 14.3 +1.4 pp
2004 12.91 −0.33 pp
2003 13.24 +0.73 pp
2002 12.51 +0.18 pp
2001 12.33 −0.6 pp
2000 12.92 −1.2 pp
1999 14.13 −0.33 pp
1998 14.46 −1.56 pp
1997 16.02 −1.76 pp
1996 17.78 −0.33 pp
1995 18.11 +0.15 pp
1994 17.96 −0.97 pp
1993 18.94 +3.99 pp
1992 14.95 +2.54 pp
1991 12.41 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.