Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Southern Europe

Youth unemployment in Southern Europe in 2025 — 22.09%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 5.57 pp.

2025 22.09% −0.76 pp vs 2024
World rank —
Period maximum 47.28%2013
Period minimum 22.09%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Southern Europe, 1991–20252030405019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 27.66%1992: 29.3%1993: 32.91%1994: 34.16%1995: 34%1996: 34.66%1997: 33.78%1998: 32.29%1999: 30.27%2000: 28.31%2001: 25.54%2002: 25.63%2003: 26.34%2004: 25.7%2005: 25.06%2006: 23.41%2007: 22.26%2008: 23.77%2009: 30.73%2010: 34.38%2011: 38.07%2012: 44.36%2013: 47.28%2014: 46.72%2015: 43.4%2016: 39.67%2017: 35.38%2018: 32.01%2019: 29.2%2020: 31.84%2021: 30.8%2022: 25.8%2023: 24.82%2024: 22.85%2025: 22.09%
Change over the period: −5.57 pp Annual average: -0.16 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Southern Europe

Southern Europe 22.09%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Southern Europe, by year Southern Europe All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 22.09 −0.76 pp
2024 22.85 −1.97 pp
2023 24.82 −0.98 pp
2022 25.8 −4.99 pp
2021 30.8 −1.04 pp
2020 31.84 +2.64 pp
2019 29.2 −2.81 pp
2018 32.01 −3.37 pp
2017 35.38 −4.29 pp
2016 39.67 −3.72 pp
2015 43.4 −3.33 pp
2014 46.72 −0.56 pp
2013 47.28 +2.92 pp
2012 44.36 +6.29 pp
2011 38.07 +3.69 pp
2010 34.38 +3.65 pp
2009 30.73 +6.96 pp
2008 23.77 +1.51 pp
2007 22.26 −1.15 pp
2006 23.41 −1.65 pp
2005 25.06 −0.64 pp
2004 25.7 −0.64 pp
2003 26.34 +0.71 pp
2002 25.63 +0.1 pp
2001 25.54 −2.77 pp
2000 28.31 −1.96 pp
1999 30.27 −2.02 pp
1998 32.29 −1.48 pp
1997 33.78 −0.89 pp
1996 34.66 +0.66 pp
1995 34 −0.16 pp
1994 34.16 +1.25 pp
1993 32.91 +3.61 pp
1992 29.3 +1.64 pp
1991 27.66 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.