Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Ecuador

Youth unemployment in Ecuador in 2025 — 8.16%. Ranked 50 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.99 pp.

2025 8.16% −0.41 pp vs 2024
World rank 50of 182
Period maximum 11.07%2020
Period minimum 7.02%2007

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Ecuador, 1991–202568101219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 9.15%1992: 9.13%1993: 9.26%1994: 9.32%1995: 9.35%1996: 9.4%1997: 9.48%1998: 9.26%1999: 9.6%2000: 9.77%2001: 8.55%2002: 9.51%2003: 10.85%2004: 10.2%2005: 7.86%2006: 7.93%2007: 7.02%2008: 9.16%2009: 9.86%2010: 9.29%2011: 8.9%2012: 8.54%2013: 8.33%2014: 9.03%2015: 8.82%2016: 10.35%2017: 8.47%2018: 7.96%2019: 8.73%2020: 11.07%2021: 9.14%2022: 8.3%2023: 7.78%2024: 8.57%2025: 8.16%
Change over the period: −0.99 pp Annual average: -0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Ecuador

Ecuador 8.16%
World 13.41%
South America computed 14.31%
Youth unemployment — Ecuador, by year Ecuador All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 8.16 −0.41 pp
2024 8.57 +0.79 pp
2023 7.78 −0.52 pp
2022 8.3 −0.84 pp
2021 9.14 −1.93 pp
2020 11.07 +2.34 pp
2019 8.73 +0.78 pp
2018 7.96 −0.51 pp
2017 8.47 −1.88 pp
2016 10.35 +1.53 pp
2015 8.82 −0.21 pp
2014 9.03 +0.7 pp
2013 8.33 −0.21 pp
2012 8.54 −0.36 pp
2011 8.9 −0.39 pp
2010 9.29 −0.58 pp
2009 9.86 +0.7 pp
2008 9.16 +2.15 pp
2007 7.02 −0.91 pp
2006 7.93 +0.06 pp
2005 7.86 −2.34 pp
2004 10.2 −0.65 pp
2003 10.85 +1.34 pp
2002 9.51 +0.96 pp
2001 8.55 −1.22 pp
2000 9.77 +0.16 pp
1999 9.6 +0.34 pp
1998 9.26 −0.22 pp
1997 9.48 +0.08 pp
1996 9.4 +0.05 pp
1995 9.35 +0.03 pp
1994 9.32 +0.06 pp
1993 9.26 +0.13 pp
1992 9.13 −0.02 pp
1991 9.15 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.