Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Peru

Youth unemployment in Peru in 2025 — 9.45%. Ranked 65 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 3.46 pp.

2025 9.45% −0.25 pp vs 2024
World rank 65of 182
Period maximum 12.66%2020
Period minimum 5.7%1994

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Peru, 1991–202546810121419911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 5.99%1992: 6.08%1993: 5.91%1994: 5.7%1995: 5.83%1996: 5.93%1997: 5.77%1998: 6.02%1999: 5.99%2000: 5.95%2001: 6.07%2002: 5.94%2003: 6.36%2004: 7.74%2005: 8.43%2006: 7.15%2007: 7.54%2008: 7.43%2009: 7.11%2010: 6.84%2011: 7%2012: 6.85%2013: 7.01%2014: 7.55%2015: 6.88%2016: 8.27%2017: 8.32%2018: 8.34%2019: 7.41%2020: 12.66%2021: 9.59%2022: 7.68%2023: 8.85%2024: 9.7%2025: 9.45%
Change over the period: +3.46 pp Annual average: 0.1 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Peru

Peru 9.45%
World 13.41%
South America computed 14.31%
Youth unemployment — Peru, by year Peru All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.45 −0.25 pp
2024 9.7 +0.86 pp
2023 8.85 +1.17 pp
2022 7.68 −1.91 pp
2021 9.59 −3.07 pp
2020 12.66 +5.25 pp
2019 7.41 −0.94 pp
2018 8.34 +0.02 pp
2017 8.32 +0.05 pp
2016 8.27 +1.4 pp
2015 6.88 −0.67 pp
2014 7.55 +0.54 pp
2013 7.01 +0.16 pp
2012 6.85 −0.15 pp
2011 7 +0.16 pp
2010 6.84 −0.27 pp
2009 7.11 −0.32 pp
2008 7.43 −0.11 pp
2007 7.54 +0.39 pp
2006 7.15 −1.28 pp
2005 8.43 +0.69 pp
2004 7.74 +1.37 pp
2003 6.36 +0.43 pp
2002 5.94 −0.13 pp
2001 6.07 +0.12 pp
2000 5.95 −0.04 pp
1999 5.99 −0.03 pp
1998 6.02 +0.25 pp
1997 5.77 −0.15 pp
1996 5.93 +0.1 pp
1995 5.83 +0.13 pp
1994 5.7 −0.21 pp
1993 5.91 −0.17 pp
1992 6.08 +0.09 pp
1991 5.99 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.