Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Croatia

Youth unemployment in Croatia in 2025 — 16.47%. Ranked 118 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 23.8 pp.

2025 16.47% −0 pp vs 2024
World rank 118of 182
Period maximum 50.49%2013
Period minimum 16.47%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Croatia, 1991–2025020406019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 40.27%1992: 38.18%1993: 36.07%1994: 33.48%1995: 31.16%1996: 29.08%1997: 28.15%1998: 31.85%1999: 36.58%2000: 41.87%2001: 39.72%2002: 36.53%2003: 36.09%2004: 32.83%2005: 32.54%2006: 29.1%2007: 25.12%2008: 23.68%2009: 25.21%2010: 32.36%2011: 36.67%2012: 42.51%2013: 50.49%2014: 45.7%2015: 42.31%2016: 30.95%2017: 27.43%2018: 23.51%2019: 16.71%2020: 20.67%2021: 21.54%2022: 17.74%2023: 18.91%2024: 16.48%2025: 16.47%
Change over the period: −23.8 pp Annual average: -0.7 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Croatia

Croatia 16.47%
World 13.41%
Southern Europe computed 22.09%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Croatia, by year Croatia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 16.47 −0 pp
2024 16.48 −2.43 pp
2023 18.91 +1.17 pp
2022 17.74 −3.8 pp
2021 21.54 +0.87 pp
2020 20.67 +3.96 pp
2019 16.71 −6.8 pp
2018 23.51 −3.92 pp
2017 27.43 −3.52 pp
2016 30.95 −11.36 pp
2015 42.31 −3.39 pp
2014 45.7 −4.79 pp
2013 50.49 +7.98 pp
2012 42.51 +5.85 pp
2011 36.67 +4.31 pp
2010 32.36 +7.14 pp
2009 25.21 +1.54 pp
2008 23.68 −1.45 pp
2007 25.12 −3.98 pp
2006 29.1 −3.44 pp
2005 32.54 −0.29 pp
2004 32.83 −3.26 pp
2003 36.09 −0.44 pp
2002 36.53 −3.19 pp
2001 39.72 −2.15 pp
2000 41.87 +5.29 pp
1999 36.58 +4.73 pp
1998 31.85 +3.7 pp
1997 28.15 −0.92 pp
1996 29.08 −2.08 pp
1995 31.16 −2.32 pp
1994 33.48 −2.6 pp
1993 36.07 −2.11 pp
1992 38.18 −2.09 pp
1991 40.27 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.