Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Serbia

Youth unemployment in Serbia in 2025 — 20.93%. Ranked 140 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 8.5 pp.

2025 20.93% −0.52 pp vs 2024
World rank 140of 182
Period maximum 51.24%2012
Period minimum 20.93%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Serbia, 1991–2025203040506019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 29.43%1992: 29.41%1993: 29.41%1994: 29.42%1995: 29.45%1996: 29.2%1997: 30.83%1998: 30.64%1999: 30.33%2000: 28.03%2001: 28.66%2002: 31.33%2003: 35.06%2004: 41.73%2005: 47.13%2006: 48%2007: 43.61%2008: 35.08%2009: 41.39%2010: 46.44%2011: 51.18%2012: 51.24%2013: 49.46%2014: 47.63%2015: 43.23%2016: 34.96%2017: 31.91%2018: 29.7%2019: 27.5%2020: 26.61%2021: 24.5%2022: 23.27%2023: 24.13%2024: 21.45%2025: 20.93%
Change over the period: −8.5 pp Annual average: -0.25 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Serbia

Serbia 20.93%
World 13.41%
Southern Europe computed 22.09%
Youth unemployment — Serbia, by year Serbia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 20.93 −0.52 pp
2024 21.45 −2.68 pp
2023 24.13 +0.86 pp
2022 23.27 −1.23 pp
2021 24.5 −2.11 pp
2020 26.61 −0.89 pp
2019 27.5 −2.2 pp
2018 29.7 −2.21 pp
2017 31.91 −3.06 pp
2016 34.96 −8.27 pp
2015 43.23 −4.4 pp
2014 47.63 −1.83 pp
2013 49.46 −1.78 pp
2012 51.24 +0.06 pp
2011 51.18 +4.74 pp
2010 46.44 +5.05 pp
2009 41.39 +6.32 pp
2008 35.08 −8.53 pp
2007 43.61 −4.4 pp
2006 48 +0.87 pp
2005 47.13 +5.41 pp
2004 41.73 +6.67 pp
2003 35.06 +3.73 pp
2002 31.33 +2.67 pp
2001 28.66 +0.63 pp
2000 28.03 −2.3 pp
1999 30.33 −0.31 pp
1998 30.64 −0.19 pp
1997 30.83 +1.63 pp
1996 29.2 −0.26 pp
1995 29.45 +0.04 pp
1994 29.42 +0.01 pp
1993 29.41 +0 pp
1992 29.41 −0.02 pp
1991 29.43 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.