Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Denmark

Youth unemployment in Denmark in 2025 — 11.74%. Ranked 88 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.24 pp.

2025 11.74% −0.05 pp vs 2024
World rank 88of 182
Period maximum 16.31%2011
Period minimum 6.73%2000

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Denmark, 1991–202557.51012.51517.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 11.5%1992: 12.31%1993: 14.59%1994: 10.18%1995: 9.93%1996: 10.59%1997: 8.1%1998: 7.17%1999: 9.89%2000: 6.73%2001: 8.23%2002: 7.04%2003: 9.8%2004: 7.78%2005: 8.6%2006: 7.69%2007: 7.5%2008: 9.47%2009: 13.44%2010: 15.55%2011: 16.31%2012: 15.78%2013: 14.77%2014: 14.2%2015: 12.15%2016: 12.15%2017: 12.38%2018: 10.52%2019: 10.04%2020: 11.63%2021: 10.8%2022: 10.53%2023: 11.5%2024: 11.79%2025: 11.74%
Change over the period: +0.24 pp Annual average: 0.01 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Denmark

Denmark 11.74%
World 13.41%
Northern Europe computed 15.5%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Denmark, by year Denmark All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 11.74 −0.05 pp
2024 11.79 +0.29 pp
2023 11.5 +0.97 pp
2022 10.53 −0.27 pp
2021 10.8 −0.83 pp
2020 11.63 +1.59 pp
2019 10.04 −0.48 pp
2018 10.52 −1.86 pp
2017 12.38 +0.24 pp
2016 12.15 −0 pp
2015 12.15 −2.04 pp
2014 14.2 −0.58 pp
2013 14.77 −1 pp
2012 15.78 −0.53 pp
2011 16.31 +0.75 pp
2010 15.55 +2.11 pp
2009 13.44 +3.97 pp
2008 9.47 +1.98 pp
2007 7.5 −0.19 pp
2006 7.69 −0.92 pp
2005 8.6 +0.83 pp
2004 7.78 −2.03 pp
2003 9.8 +2.76 pp
2002 7.04 −1.19 pp
2001 8.23 +1.5 pp
2000 6.73 −3.16 pp
1999 9.89 +2.72 pp
1998 7.17 −0.93 pp
1997 8.1 −2.49 pp
1996 10.59 +0.65 pp
1995 9.93 −0.25 pp
1994 10.18 −4.41 pp
1993 14.59 +2.28 pp
1992 12.31 +0.81 pp
1991 11.5 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.