Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Israel

Youth unemployment in Israel in 2025 — 6.03%. Ranked 34 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 16.07 pp.

2025 6.03% −0.13 pp vs 2024
World rank 34of 182
Period maximum 22.63%1992
Period minimum 5.87%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Israel, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 22.11%1992: 22.63%1993: 20.68%1994: 16.65%1995: 14.91%1996: 13.55%1997: 15.03%1998: 16.94%1999: 16.72%2000: 17.32%2001: 18.7%2002: 20.85%2003: 22.41%2004: 20.66%2005: 17.86%2006: 18.41%2007: 16.25%2008: 12.48%2009: 14.71%2010: 14.22%2011: 11.83%2012: 11.99%2013: 10.4%2014: 10.43%2015: 9.2%2016: 8.51%2017: 7.15%2018: 7.03%2019: 6.53%2020: 7.65%2021: 7.65%2022: 6.72%2023: 5.87%2024: 6.16%2025: 6.03%
Change over the period: −16.07 pp Annual average: -0.47 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Israel

Israel 6.03%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Israel, by year Israel All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.03 −0.13 pp
2024 6.16 +0.29 pp
2023 5.87 −0.85 pp
2022 6.72 −0.93 pp
2021 7.65 +0 pp
2020 7.65 +1.12 pp
2019 6.53 −0.5 pp
2018 7.03 −0.13 pp
2017 7.15 −1.36 pp
2016 8.51 −0.69 pp
2015 9.2 −1.23 pp
2014 10.43 +0.03 pp
2013 10.4 −1.59 pp
2012 11.99 +0.17 pp
2011 11.83 −2.4 pp
2010 14.22 −0.49 pp
2009 14.71 +2.23 pp
2008 12.48 −3.77 pp
2007 16.25 −2.16 pp
2006 18.41 +0.55 pp
2005 17.86 −2.8 pp
2004 20.66 −1.75 pp
2003 22.41 +1.56 pp
2002 20.85 +2.14 pp
2001 18.7 +1.39 pp
2000 17.32 +0.6 pp
1999 16.72 −0.23 pp
1998 16.94 +1.91 pp
1997 15.03 +1.48 pp
1996 13.55 −1.36 pp
1995 14.91 −1.73 pp
1994 16.65 −4.03 pp
1993 20.68 −1.95 pp
1992 22.63 +0.52 pp
1991 22.11 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.