Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Syria

Youth unemployment in Syria in 2025 — 33.1%. Ranked 167 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 20.97 pp.

2025 33.1% +0.33 pp vs 2024
World rank 167of 182
Period maximum 36.29%2020
Period minimum 12.13%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Syria, 1991–202501020304019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.13%1992: 12.65%1993: 13.57%1994: 13.7%1995: 13.07%1996: 13.24%1997: 13.5%1998: 13.73%1999: 14.29%2000: 18.24%2001: 21.98%2002: 20.68%2003: 19.43%2004: 18.78%2005: 18.18%2006: 17.65%2007: 18.92%2008: 22.15%2009: 16.32%2010: 20.49%2011: 21.11%2012: 33.81%2013: 35.45%2014: 35.98%2015: 34.81%2016: 33.63%2017: 32.89%2018: 32.41%2019: 32.06%2020: 36.29%2021: 34.65%2022: 31.99%2023: 32.26%2024: 32.77%2025: 33.1%
Change over the period: +20.97 pp Annual average: 0.62 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Syria

Syria 33.1%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
Low-income countries computed 8.88%
Youth unemployment — Syria, by year Syria All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 33.1 +0.33 pp
2024 32.77 +0.51 pp
2023 32.26 +0.27 pp
2022 31.99 −2.66 pp
2021 34.65 −1.64 pp
2020 36.29 +4.23 pp
2019 32.06 −0.36 pp
2018 32.41 −0.48 pp
2017 32.89 −0.75 pp
2016 33.63 −1.17 pp
2015 34.81 −1.17 pp
2014 35.98 +0.53 pp
2013 35.45 +1.64 pp
2012 33.81 +12.7 pp
2011 21.11 +0.61 pp
2010 20.49 +4.18 pp
2009 16.32 −5.83 pp
2008 22.15 +3.23 pp
2007 18.92 +1.28 pp
2006 17.65 −0.53 pp
2005 18.18 −0.6 pp
2004 18.78 −0.66 pp
2003 19.43 −1.25 pp
2002 20.68 −1.3 pp
2001 21.98 +3.75 pp
2000 18.24 +3.94 pp
1999 14.29 +0.57 pp
1998 13.73 +0.23 pp
1997 13.5 +0.25 pp
1996 13.24 +0.17 pp
1995 13.07 −0.63 pp
1994 13.7 +0.13 pp
1993 13.57 +0.92 pp
1992 12.65 +0.52 pp
1991 12.13 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.