Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Jordan

Youth unemployment in Jordan in 2025 — 38.88%. Ranked 175 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 5.04 pp.

2025 38.88% −0.18 pp vs 2024
World rank 175of 182
Period maximum 43.91%1991
Period minimum 27.61%2014

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Jordan, 1991–2025253035404519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 43.91%1992: 42%1993: 42.22%1994: 37%1995: 32.55%1996: 30.7%1997: 31.08%1998: 31.53%1999: 31.6%2000: 31.65%2001: 33.9%2002: 35.35%2003: 33.29%2004: 34.09%2005: 34.99%2006: 33.02%2007: 31.76%2008: 30.72%2009: 31.37%2010: 30.06%2011: 30.79%2012: 28.85%2013: 29.54%2014: 27.61%2015: 30.91%2016: 35.61%2017: 35.44%2018: 38.94%2019: 37.21%2020: 42.46%2021: 43.86%2022: 42.03%2023: 38.84%2024: 39.05%2025: 38.88%
Change over the period: −5.04 pp Annual average: -0.15 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Jordan

Jordan 38.88%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
Youth unemployment — Jordan, by year Jordan All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 38.88 −0.18 pp
2024 39.05 +0.22 pp
2023 38.84 −3.19 pp
2022 42.03 −1.83 pp
2021 43.86 +1.4 pp
2020 42.46 +5.25 pp
2019 37.21 −1.74 pp
2018 38.94 +3.5 pp
2017 35.44 −0.17 pp
2016 35.61 +4.7 pp
2015 30.91 +3.3 pp
2014 27.61 −1.92 pp
2013 29.54 +0.68 pp
2012 28.85 −1.93 pp
2011 30.79 +0.73 pp
2010 30.06 −1.31 pp
2009 31.37 +0.65 pp
2008 30.72 −1.04 pp
2007 31.76 −1.27 pp
2006 33.02 −1.97 pp
2005 34.99 +0.9 pp
2004 34.09 +0.81 pp
2003 33.29 −2.06 pp
2002 35.35 +1.45 pp
2001 33.9 +2.25 pp
2000 31.65 +0.05 pp
1999 31.6 +0.07 pp
1998 31.53 +0.45 pp
1997 31.08 +0.38 pp
1996 30.7 −1.84 pp
1995 32.55 −4.46 pp
1994 37 −5.22 pp
1993 42.22 +0.22 pp
1992 42 −1.91 pp
1991 43.91 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.