Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Kuwait

Youth unemployment in Kuwait in 2025 — 15.06%. Ranked 108 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 11.81 pp.

2025 15.06% −0.09 pp vs 2024
World rank 108of 182
Period maximum 19.06%2020
Period minimum 2.61%1999

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Kuwait, 1991–20250510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 3.25%1992: 3.21%1993: 3.06%1994: 2.91%1995: 2.97%1996: 2.88%1997: 2.75%1998: 2.67%1999: 2.61%2000: 2.99%2001: 2.98%2002: 4.22%2003: 5.22%2004: 7.33%2005: 6.57%2006: 5.86%2007: 6.86%2008: 7.82%2009: 7.24%2010: 8.58%2011: 10.3%2012: 11.99%2013: 13.64%2014: 15.46%2015: 16.18%2016: 15.14%2017: 15.26%2018: 15.22%2019: 15.22%2020: 19.06%2021: 17.76%2022: 15.19%2023: 15.09%2024: 15.15%2025: 15.06%
Change over the period: +11.81 pp Annual average: 0.35 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kuwait

Kuwait 15.06%
World 13.41%
Western Asia computed 18.31%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Kuwait, by year Kuwait All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.06 −0.09 pp
2024 15.15 +0.05 pp
2023 15.09 −0.1 pp
2022 15.19 −2.57 pp
2021 17.76 −1.3 pp
2020 19.06 +3.84 pp
2019 15.22 −0 pp
2018 15.22 −0.03 pp
2017 15.26 +0.11 pp
2016 15.14 −1.04 pp
2015 16.18 +0.72 pp
2014 15.46 +1.83 pp
2013 13.64 +1.64 pp
2012 11.99 +1.7 pp
2011 10.3 +1.71 pp
2010 8.58 +1.34 pp
2009 7.24 −0.58 pp
2008 7.82 +0.96 pp
2007 6.86 +1 pp
2006 5.86 −0.72 pp
2005 6.57 −0.76 pp
2004 7.33 +2.11 pp
2003 5.22 +1 pp
2002 4.22 +1.25 pp
2001 2.98 −0.01 pp
2000 2.99 +0.38 pp
1999 2.61 −0.06 pp
1998 2.67 −0.08 pp
1997 2.75 −0.13 pp
1996 2.88 −0.09 pp
1995 2.97 +0.06 pp
1994 2.91 −0.16 pp
1993 3.06 −0.14 pp
1992 3.21 −0.04 pp
1991 3.25 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.