Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Kenya

Youth unemployment in Kenya in 2025 — 15.25%. Ranked 110 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 9.04 pp.

2025 15.25% −0.23 pp vs 2024
World rank 110of 182
Period maximum 15.49%2022
Period minimum 6.21%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Kenya, 1991–202557.51012.51517.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 6.21%1992: 6.47%1993: 6.67%1994: 6.67%1995: 6.51%1996: 6.41%1997: 6.54%1998: 6.62%1999: 6.74%2000: 6.76%2001: 6.78%2002: 6.89%2003: 6.83%2004: 6.82%2005: 6.65%2006: 6.57%2007: 6.56%2008: 6.84%2009: 7.03%2010: 7.05%2011: 6.92%2012: 6.95%2013: 7.18%2014: 7.25%2015: 7.3%2016: 7.33%2017: 9.1%2018: 10.82%2019: 12.55%2020: 13.62%2021: 12.23%2022: 15.49%2023: 15.16%2024: 15.48%2025: 15.25%
Change over the period: +9.04 pp Annual average: 0.27 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kenya

Kenya 15.25%
World 13.41%
Eastern Africa computed 7.77%
Youth unemployment — Kenya, by year Kenya All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.25 −0.23 pp
2024 15.48 +0.31 pp
2023 15.16 −0.32 pp
2022 15.49 +3.26 pp
2021 12.23 −1.39 pp
2020 13.62 +1.07 pp
2019 12.55 +1.73 pp
2018 10.82 +1.72 pp
2017 9.1 +1.76 pp
2016 7.33 +0.03 pp
2015 7.3 +0.05 pp
2014 7.25 +0.07 pp
2013 7.18 +0.24 pp
2012 6.95 +0.02 pp
2011 6.92 −0.13 pp
2010 7.05 +0.02 pp
2009 7.03 +0.19 pp
2008 6.84 +0.28 pp
2007 6.56 −0.01 pp
2006 6.57 −0.08 pp
2005 6.65 −0.16 pp
2004 6.82 −0.01 pp
2003 6.83 −0.06 pp
2002 6.89 +0.11 pp
2001 6.78 +0.01 pp
2000 6.76 +0.03 pp
1999 6.74 +0.12 pp
1998 6.62 +0.08 pp
1997 6.54 +0.13 pp
1996 6.41 −0.1 pp
1995 6.51 −0.16 pp
1994 6.67 +0 pp
1993 6.67 +0.2 pp
1992 6.47 +0.26 pp
1991 6.21 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.