Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Malawi

Youth unemployment in Malawi in 2025 — 6.95%. Ranked 43 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 0.24 pp.

2025 6.95% +0.06 pp vs 2024
World rank 43of 182
Period maximum 7.83%2020
Period minimum 6.44%1997

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Malawi, 1991–202566.577.5819911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 6.7%1992: 6.86%1993: 6.78%1994: 7.14%1995: 6.67%1996: 6.7%1997: 6.44%1998: 6.66%1999: 6.73%2000: 6.76%2001: 6.92%2002: 6.94%2003: 6.85%2004: 6.65%2005: 6.62%2006: 6.64%2007: 6.58%2008: 6.51%2009: 6.46%2010: 6.52%2011: 6.58%2012: 6.71%2013: 6.75%2014: 6.75%2015: 6.75%2016: 6.82%2017: 6.87%2018: 6.85%2019: 6.81%2020: 7.83%2021: 7.63%2022: 6.85%2023: 6.84%2024: 6.89%2025: 6.95%
Change over the period: +0.24 pp Annual average: 0.01 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Malawi

Malawi 6.95%
World 13.41%
Eastern Africa computed 7.77%
Low-income countries computed 8.88%
Youth unemployment — Malawi, by year Malawi All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.95 +0.06 pp
2024 6.89 +0.05 pp
2023 6.84 −0.01 pp
2022 6.85 −0.78 pp
2021 7.63 −0.2 pp
2020 7.83 +1.02 pp
2019 6.81 −0.04 pp
2018 6.85 −0.01 pp
2017 6.87 +0.05 pp
2016 6.82 +0.07 pp
2015 6.75 −0 pp
2014 6.75 +0 pp
2013 6.75 +0.04 pp
2012 6.71 +0.13 pp
2011 6.58 +0.06 pp
2010 6.52 +0.06 pp
2009 6.46 −0.05 pp
2008 6.51 −0.07 pp
2007 6.58 −0.07 pp
2006 6.64 +0.03 pp
2005 6.62 −0.03 pp
2004 6.65 −0.2 pp
2003 6.85 −0.09 pp
2002 6.94 +0.02 pp
2001 6.92 +0.16 pp
2000 6.76 +0.03 pp
1999 6.73 +0.07 pp
1998 6.66 +0.22 pp
1997 6.44 −0.26 pp
1996 6.7 +0.03 pp
1995 6.67 −0.47 pp
1994 7.14 +0.36 pp
1993 6.78 −0.08 pp
1992 6.86 +0.16 pp
1991 6.7 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.