Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Mauritius

Youth unemployment in Mauritius in 2025 — 17.37%. Ranked 121 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 5.33 pp.

2025 17.37% +0.88 pp vs 2024
World rank 121of 182
Period maximum 27.84%2001
Period minimum 16.45%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Mauritius, 1991–20251520253019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 22.71%1992: 22.87%1993: 23.25%1994: 23.48%1995: 23.83%1996: 24.3%1997: 24.69%1998: 25.1%1999: 25.93%2000: 26.39%2001: 27.84%2002: 25.74%2003: 25.25%2004: 24.66%2005: 25.66%2006: 23.25%2007: 24.52%2008: 19.21%2009: 21.44%2010: 23.52%2011: 21.59%2012: 23.57%2013: 22.18%2014: 24.73%2015: 25.56%2016: 22.98%2017: 24.23%2018: 24.2%2019: 22.08%2020: 25.03%2021: 25.37%2022: 22.32%2023: 16.45%2024: 16.5%2025: 17.37%
Change over the period: −5.33 pp Annual average: -0.16 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Mauritius

Mauritius 17.37%
World 13.41%
Eastern Africa computed 7.77%
Youth unemployment — Mauritius, by year Mauritius All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 17.37 +0.88 pp
2024 16.5 +0.05 pp
2023 16.45 −5.87 pp
2022 22.32 −3.05 pp
2021 25.37 +0.34 pp
2020 25.03 +2.95 pp
2019 22.08 −2.11 pp
2018 24.2 −0.04 pp
2017 24.23 +1.25 pp
2016 22.98 −2.59 pp
2015 25.56 +0.84 pp
2014 24.73 +2.55 pp
2013 22.18 −1.4 pp
2012 23.57 +1.99 pp
2011 21.59 −1.94 pp
2010 23.52 +2.09 pp
2009 21.44 +2.23 pp
2008 19.21 −5.31 pp
2007 24.52 +1.26 pp
2006 23.25 −2.41 pp
2005 25.66 +1 pp
2004 24.66 −0.59 pp
2003 25.25 −0.49 pp
2002 25.74 −2.1 pp
2001 27.84 +1.46 pp
2000 26.39 +0.46 pp
1999 25.93 +0.83 pp
1998 25.1 +0.41 pp
1997 24.69 +0.4 pp
1996 24.3 +0.46 pp
1995 23.83 +0.35 pp
1994 23.48 +0.23 pp
1993 23.25 +0.39 pp
1992 22.87 +0.16 pp
1991 22.71 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.