Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Uganda

Youth unemployment in Uganda in 2025 — 4.18%. Ranked 21 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.94 pp.

2025 4.18% −0.03 pp vs 2024
World rank 21of 182
Period maximum 5.69%2020
Period minimum 2.59%2013

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Uganda, 1991–20252345619911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 5.12%1992: 5.23%1993: 5.17%1994: 5.14%1995: 4.86%1996: 4.83%1997: 4.87%1998: 5.09%1999: 5.13%2000: 5.19%2001: 5.18%2002: 5.15%2003: 5.33%2004: 4.04%2005: 2.85%2006: 3.42%2007: 4.03%2008: 4.6%2009: 5.38%2010: 5.36%2011: 5.1%2012: 5.28%2013: 2.59%2014: 3.32%2015: 3.87%2016: 4.41%2017: 5.05%2018: 4.88%2019: 4.69%2020: 5.69%2021: 5.04%2022: 4.34%2023: 4.21%2024: 4.21%2025: 4.18%
Change over the period: −0.94 pp Annual average: -0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Uganda

Uganda 4.18%
World 13.41%
Eastern Africa computed 7.77%
Low-income countries computed 8.88%
Youth unemployment — Uganda, by year Uganda All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 4.18 −0.03 pp
2024 4.21 +0 pp
2023 4.21 −0.13 pp
2022 4.34 −0.71 pp
2021 5.04 −0.65 pp
2020 5.69 +1 pp
2019 4.69 −0.19 pp
2018 4.88 −0.17 pp
2017 5.05 +0.64 pp
2016 4.41 +0.54 pp
2015 3.87 +0.55 pp
2014 3.32 +0.73 pp
2013 2.59 −2.68 pp
2012 5.28 +0.18 pp
2011 5.1 −0.26 pp
2010 5.36 −0.02 pp
2009 5.38 +0.78 pp
2008 4.6 +0.57 pp
2007 4.03 +0.61 pp
2006 3.42 +0.57 pp
2005 2.85 −1.18 pp
2004 4.04 −1.3 pp
2003 5.33 +0.18 pp
2002 5.15 −0.03 pp
2001 5.18 −0.02 pp
2000 5.19 +0.07 pp
1999 5.13 +0.04 pp
1998 5.09 +0.22 pp
1997 4.87 +0.04 pp
1996 4.83 −0.03 pp
1995 4.86 −0.28 pp
1994 5.14 −0.03 pp
1993 5.17 −0.06 pp
1992 5.23 +0.11 pp
1991 5.12 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.