Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Indonesia

Youth unemployment in Indonesia in 2025 — 12.98%. Ranked 93 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 5.13 pp.

2025 12.98% −0.1 pp vs 2024
World rank 93of 182
Period maximum 26.3%2005
Period minimum 7.84%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Indonesia, 1991–2025010203019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 7.84%1992: 8.22%1993: 8.55%1994: 13.08%1995: 13.99%1996: 14.93%1997: 14.94%1998: 16.75%1999: 19.28%2000: 19.15%2001: 19.04%2002: 21.43%2003: 21.44%2004: 23.62%2005: 26.3%2006: 24.62%2007: 22.86%2008: 19.64%2009: 19.11%2010: 17.69%2011: 18.39%2012: 15.67%2013: 15.98%2014: 15.98%2015: 17.22%2016: 16%2017: 14.55%2018: 16.37%2019: 13.58%2020: 14.77%2021: 13.8%2022: 14.05%2023: 13.02%2024: 13.08%2025: 12.98%
Change over the period: +5.13 pp Annual average: 0.15 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Indonesia

Indonesia 12.98%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Indonesia, by year Indonesia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 12.98 −0.1 pp
2024 13.08 +0.06 pp
2023 13.02 −1.04 pp
2022 14.05 +0.25 pp
2021 13.8 −0.97 pp
2020 14.77 +1.2 pp
2019 13.58 −2.79 pp
2018 16.37 +1.82 pp
2017 14.55 −1.44 pp
2016 16 −1.23 pp
2015 17.22 +1.25 pp
2014 15.98 +0 pp
2013 15.98 +0.3 pp
2012 15.67 −2.72 pp
2011 18.39 +0.7 pp
2010 17.69 −1.42 pp
2009 19.11 −0.54 pp
2008 19.64 −3.22 pp
2007 22.86 −1.76 pp
2006 24.62 −1.69 pp
2005 26.3 +2.69 pp
2004 23.62 +2.18 pp
2003 21.44 +0 pp
2002 21.43 +2.4 pp
2001 19.04 −0.11 pp
2000 19.15 −0.13 pp
1999 19.28 +2.53 pp
1998 16.75 +1.8 pp
1997 14.94 +0.01 pp
1996 14.93 +0.94 pp
1995 13.99 +0.91 pp
1994 13.08 +4.54 pp
1993 8.55 +0.32 pp
1992 8.22 +0.38 pp
1991 7.84 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.