Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Thailand

Youth unemployment in Thailand in 2025 — 4.53%. Ranked 24 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 0.56 pp.

2025 4.53% −0.13 pp vs 2024
World rank 24of 182
Period maximum 8.07%1999
Period minimum 1.23%2013

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Thailand, 1991–202502.557.51019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 5.09%1992: 2.69%1993: 2.95%1994: 2.71%1995: 2.37%1996: 2.53%1997: 2.24%1998: 7.66%1999: 8.07%2000: 6.82%2001: 7.87%2002: 5.76%2003: 5.19%2004: 4.6%2005: 4.81%2006: 4.84%2007: 4.55%2008: 4.87%2009: 5.73%2010: 2.6%2011: 2.95%2012: 2.76%2013: 1.23%2014: 3.11%2015: 3.09%2016: 3.71%2017: 4.37%2018: 4.01%2019: 4.19%2020: 5.2%2021: 5.86%2022: 5.21%2023: 4.49%2024: 4.66%2025: 4.53%
Change over the period: −0.56 pp Annual average: -0.02 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Thailand

Thailand 4.53%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Thailand, by year Thailand All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 4.53 −0.13 pp
2024 4.66 +0.17 pp
2023 4.49 −0.72 pp
2022 5.21 −0.65 pp
2021 5.86 +0.66 pp
2020 5.2 +1.01 pp
2019 4.19 +0.18 pp
2018 4.01 −0.36 pp
2017 4.37 +0.66 pp
2016 3.71 +0.62 pp
2015 3.09 −0.02 pp
2014 3.11 +1.88 pp
2013 1.23 −1.53 pp
2012 2.76 −0.19 pp
2011 2.95 +0.35 pp
2010 2.6 −3.13 pp
2009 5.73 +0.86 pp
2008 4.87 +0.33 pp
2007 4.55 −0.29 pp
2006 4.84 +0.03 pp
2005 4.81 +0.21 pp
2004 4.6 −0.59 pp
2003 5.19 −0.57 pp
2002 5.76 −2.11 pp
2001 7.87 +1.05 pp
2000 6.82 −1.25 pp
1999 8.07 +0.4 pp
1998 7.66 +5.42 pp
1997 2.24 −0.29 pp
1996 2.53 +0.16 pp
1995 2.37 −0.34 pp
1994 2.71 −0.24 pp
1993 2.95 +0.26 pp
1992 2.69 −2.4 pp
1991 5.09 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.