Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Laos

Youth unemployment in Laos in 2025 — 2.38%. Ranked 8 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 2.82 pp.

2025 2.38% +0.21 pp vs 2024
World rank 8of 182
Period maximum 5.78%2017
Period minimum 1.58%2010

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Laos, 1991–2025024619911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 5.2%1992: 5.55%1993: 5.61%1994: 5.48%1995: 5.45%1996: 5.17%1997: 4.97%1998: 4.82%1999: 4.54%2000: 4.31%2001: 3.98%2002: 3.75%2003: 3.46%2004: 3.17%2005: 2.86%2006: 2.57%2007: 2.31%2008: 2.06%2009: 1.83%2010: 1.58%2011: 2.02%2012: 2.47%2013: 2.94%2014: 3.41%2015: 3.9%2016: 4.84%2017: 5.78%2018: 5.13%2019: 4.47%2020: 4.24%2021: 3.33%2022: 2.18%2023: 2.18%2024: 2.18%2025: 2.38%
Change over the period: −2.82 pp Annual average: -0.08 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Laos

Laos 2.38%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Laos, by year Laos All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 2.38 +0.21 pp
2024 2.18 +0 pp
2023 2.18 −0.01 pp
2022 2.18 −1.14 pp
2021 3.33 −0.91 pp
2020 4.24 −0.24 pp
2019 4.47 −0.66 pp
2018 5.13 −0.65 pp
2017 5.78 +0.94 pp
2016 4.84 +0.94 pp
2015 3.9 +0.49 pp
2014 3.41 +0.48 pp
2013 2.94 +0.47 pp
2012 2.47 +0.45 pp
2011 2.02 +0.44 pp
2010 1.58 −0.25 pp
2009 1.83 −0.23 pp
2008 2.06 −0.25 pp
2007 2.31 −0.26 pp
2006 2.57 −0.3 pp
2005 2.86 −0.3 pp
2004 3.17 −0.29 pp
2003 3.46 −0.29 pp
2002 3.75 −0.24 pp
2001 3.98 −0.33 pp
2000 4.31 −0.23 pp
1999 4.54 −0.27 pp
1998 4.82 −0.16 pp
1997 4.97 −0.2 pp
1996 5.17 −0.28 pp
1995 5.45 −0.03 pp
1994 5.48 −0.13 pp
1993 5.61 +0.05 pp
1992 5.55 +0.35 pp
1991 5.2 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.