Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Singapore

Youth unemployment in Singapore in 2025 — 6.78%. Ranked 41 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 2.91 pp.

2025 6.78% +0.45 pp vs 2024
World rank 41of 182
Period maximum 12.49%2009
Period minimum 3.87%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Singapore, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 3.87%1992: 6.7%1993: 7.12%1994: 7.33%1995: 6.89%1996: 8.44%1997: 5.29%1998: 7.67%1999: 9.2%2000: 6.83%2001: 7.4%2002: 10.77%2003: 9.85%2004: 10.51%2005: 10.38%2006: 8.63%2007: 8.5%2008: 8.81%2009: 12.49%2010: 9.41%2011: 8.87%2012: 8.53%2013: 8.9%2014: 8.38%2015: 8.89%2016: 8.72%2017: 9.34%2018: 8.44%2019: 7.63%2020: 10.56%2021: 9.5%2022: 7.92%2023: 8.52%2024: 6.33%2025: 6.78%
Change over the period: +2.91 pp Annual average: 0.09 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Singapore

Singapore 6.78%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Singapore, by year Singapore All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.78 +0.45 pp
2024 6.33 −2.19 pp
2023 8.52 +0.59 pp
2022 7.92 −1.58 pp
2021 9.5 −1.06 pp
2020 10.56 +2.93 pp
2019 7.63 −0.81 pp
2018 8.44 −0.9 pp
2017 9.34 +0.61 pp
2016 8.72 −0.17 pp
2015 8.89 +0.52 pp
2014 8.38 −0.53 pp
2013 8.9 +0.37 pp
2012 8.53 −0.34 pp
2011 8.87 −0.55 pp
2010 9.41 −3.08 pp
2009 12.49 +3.68 pp
2008 8.81 +0.31 pp
2007 8.5 −0.14 pp
2006 8.63 −1.75 pp
2005 10.38 −0.13 pp
2004 10.51 +0.67 pp
2003 9.85 −0.92 pp
2002 10.77 +3.37 pp
2001 7.4 +0.57 pp
2000 6.83 −2.37 pp
1999 9.2 +1.53 pp
1998 7.67 +2.38 pp
1997 5.29 −3.15 pp
1996 8.44 +1.55 pp
1995 6.89 −0.44 pp
1994 7.33 +0.21 pp
1993 7.12 +0.42 pp
1992 6.7 +2.83 pp
1991 3.87 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.