Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Malaysia

Youth unemployment in Malaysia in 2025 — 11.95%. Ranked 89 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 1.14 pp.

2025 11.95% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 89of 182
Period maximum 12.37%2020
Period minimum 7.79%1997

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Malaysia, 1991–20256810121419911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 10.81%1992: 10.99%1993: 12.35%1994: 11.1%1995: 9.75%1996: 7.84%1997: 7.79%1998: 10.09%1999: 10.86%2000: 9.6%2001: 11.4%2002: 11.19%2003: 11.49%2004: 11.36%2005: 11.33%2006: 10.68%2007: 10.76%2008: 10.59%2009: 11.24%2010: 10.87%2011: 9.82%2012: 10.14%2013: 10.07%2014: 9.77%2015: 10.98%2016: 10.84%2017: 11.28%2018: 11.4%2019: 11.21%2020: 12.37%2021: 11.58%2022: 12.16%2023: 12.15%2024: 12.25%2025: 11.95%
Change over the period: +1.14 pp Annual average: 0.03 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Malaysia

Malaysia 11.95%
World 13.41%
South-Eastern Asia computed 9.26%
Youth unemployment — Malaysia, by year Malaysia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 11.95 −0.3 pp
2024 12.25 +0.1 pp
2023 12.15 −0.01 pp
2022 12.16 +0.58 pp
2021 11.58 −0.79 pp
2020 12.37 +1.15 pp
2019 11.21 −0.18 pp
2018 11.4 +0.12 pp
2017 11.28 +0.44 pp
2016 10.84 −0.14 pp
2015 10.98 +1.21 pp
2014 9.77 −0.3 pp
2013 10.07 −0.07 pp
2012 10.14 +0.32 pp
2011 9.82 −1.05 pp
2010 10.87 −0.36 pp
2009 11.24 +0.65 pp
2008 10.59 −0.17 pp
2007 10.76 +0.08 pp
2006 10.68 −0.64 pp
2005 11.33 −0.04 pp
2004 11.36 −0.13 pp
2003 11.49 +0.3 pp
2002 11.19 −0.21 pp
2001 11.4 +1.8 pp
2000 9.6 −1.26 pp
1999 10.86 +0.76 pp
1998 10.09 +2.31 pp
1997 7.79 −0.05 pp
1996 7.84 −1.92 pp
1995 9.75 −1.35 pp
1994 11.1 −1.26 pp
1993 12.35 +1.37 pp
1992 10.99 +0.18 pp
1991 10.81 —

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.